First things first, a note to my friends and followers outside the U.S. This very long post is only intended for those in America. For logistical and legal reasons, I do not wish to take any actions outside the U.S. at this time.
Well, I have finally taken the next step of my plan to actually do something important to benefit the world, for the first time in my life. My first step was to decide that I was going to forgo seeking a room and live out of my car for at least a month as a way to motivate myself to take the money I'll save and use it for beneficial cause. My second step, yesterday, was to inquire at Planned Parenthood (where I needed to go anyway for regular testing) about how to find a suitable candidate, which I'm defining as a young woman who is going to college but is pregnant and cannot afford an abortion. This might not be the best use of my money, but it's the most rational idea I've conceived at this time. The PP employee listed a few donation options and gave me the number for a call center where I can hopefully be directed to the right person to speak to.
A little background first, though. I regret to say that I have wasted nearly two decades of my life thinking about the world's problems and dreaming up solutions, but not actually acting, except in the area of changing my own behaviour: giving up materialism, trying to conserve where feasible, and trying live according to the principles I espouse (having a vasectomy, promoting transparency by example). It is often said that change starts with onesself, but I never really bought into that. Fact is, I've realized this whole time that I've just been procrastinating.
My first form of procrastination was the pie-in-the-sky idea that I would use my talents as a computer programmer to start my own company, become a billionaire, and use that money to help the world. It did not take long for me to realize I had neither the discipline, the business skill, nor the killer app idea for that, and I came to accept that my best contribution would be my unique philosophical insights.
Still, I could have started putting some money into implementing some of my early ideas, but I rationalized my procrastination by convincing myself that before acting, I needed to complete my philosophy. As you can see, there is not much there. What you see was written one night in 2007 after years (about a decade, really) of thought, but one it got late I went home, and I never got back to it. I've added to this document over the years, but only IN MY HEAD. Every time I've pulled it up and sat down to actually write, I've gotten discouraged by the sheer difficulty of expression what I'm thinking, and then I've let myself get sidetracked by other pursuits.
First there was Starbucking that sucked up increasing amounts of my time. Then there was Scrabble, which also sucked up more and more time. There was always another Starbucks to visit, another tournament to play, another word list to study. Always this excuse or that excuse to keep from pulling up that document.
There was also a genuine reason not to act, which was the financial troubles that plagued me in the early 2000s. I finally started to get my financial house in order in the latter half of the previous decade, but because of the aforementioned Starbucking, Scrabbling, plus my generally unthrifty lifestyle, it took me until this year to reach the point at which I anticipated soon being financially comfortable enough to start giving away money.
The shadow of that unfinished document still hangs over me, and I have concerns that when I start to hear criticism about whatever steps I take to make a difference, I will not have a good defense prepared. Rather than wasting time addressing everybody, I would prefer to give the standard answer--"my actions follow logically from my philosophy"--and forward a link to the document.
I could use the excuse to keep procrastinating indefinitely, but frankly I think the thought of reaching my 40th year (March 2012) without having done anything for the world is very disturbing. Thus, I must act, and the time is now.
Getting back to my plans, I think I will have many challenges to overcome. I anticipate that once I call that Planned Parenthood call center, I might have trouble being directed to the right person. When I finally do speak to somebody, that person will not understand that I am trying to maximize the amount of benefit that I can achieve with my limited funds, which is why I'm targeting a specific category of recipient. I have no interest in my money going to a general fund where it will be used to help some random pregnant female who might just end up getting pregnant next year, or who will simply go on to live a life of concern with her own interests and do nothing for the world.
If I manage to explain myself, I might find that whomever I speak to takes offence at the idea of directed, or perhaps even conditional, aid. Or their might be policies in place that prevent PP from identifying a specific recipient--privacy concerns, for example.
If I have no luck with Planned Parenthood or similar agencies, I can try and find a beneficiary on my own, but I see that path fraught with hazards. Say I post a message on an online ad, like Craigslist--I am sure to be flooded with messages from people intending to scam me. If I do manage to find someone who seems genuine, how do I verify that she is truly pregnant? Do I have to meet her in person? Do I later have to accompany her to the clinic to render payment for the abortion? At minimum, that will have the effect of costing me income which I could be applying to help somebody else. If I try to do this remotely, I run the risk of having my money be used inappropriately.
I've also thought about talking to the local high school, or perhaps a local college. I see obvious difficulties there, starting with privacy concerns. I also anticipate suspicion might be an issue, since what I am trying to do is something I've never heard of in the mainstream media, and it is human nature to be suspicious of what is different. I cannot rule out the possibility that some school administrator might be suspicious enough to contact the authorities, and that raises a whole nother can of worms.
I haven't even mentioned the issue of abortion itself, which will automatically cause some people to oppose me and perhaps even actively try to frustrate my efforts.
Those are just the issues that come to mind now, or that I've been thinking about over the years. I am sure there are just as many issues that are not occurring, and that is what I need help with.
I need constructive criticism. I need solid information about the state of unplanned pregnancy in the U.S. Obviously, I need to know if there are even young women in the category I envision, who have been accepted to college, are not financially secure, and are pregnant. I need to know whether the fact that they got pregnant implies (by correlation) that they are less likely to succeed even if given a chance to end the pregnancy. I need to know what legal risks I may face (will I later be sued by some person I helped, for example). I need to know about possible backlash. I need to know how I can get attention for my efforts so that I can expand them in the future. I need to know a lot of things, and if I were to wait until I had a chance to research every aspect of what I want to do, I'd be back to that whole issue of procrastinating and never actually doing anything.
So please, help if you can, with good, solid, constructive ideas that can actually further my cause. If you don't have any, forward this message to someone you think can help.
Thank you for reading.
Finally, I will be tracking my progress at http://www.starbuckseverywhere.net/Bett
May 27 2011, 01:23:16 UTC 12 months ago
I guess you would have to earmark your specific donation(s) to be handled in precise ways and trust that if the organization agreed to your stipulations when accepting your money, that they would be honourable in fulfilling your wishes, and use it accordingly so that the next college girl who came in looking for assistance would get it without any hassle.
May 27 2011, 01:40:48 UTC 12 months ago
One reason I want to identify a specific recipient is so that I can ask for permission to contact her in one year (ballparking that as enough time for the emotional trauma to have subsided) so that I can suggest to her that she consider not having a child until she has accumulated enough money to guarantee the upbringing of the child. By the time of that request, I hope to have finished my philosophical foundation for why this would be an ethical thing to do.
Obviously, this plan is fraught with pitfalls about how it will be perceived. Any hint of attaching conditions to charity gets attacked by people who dogmatically believe that charity should be unconditional.
I, on the other hand, can easily go out and gather facts that support the assertion that on the whole, unconditional charity has done more harm to the world than benefit.
May 27 2011, 06:53:24 UTC 12 months ago Edited: May 27 2011, 06:54:06 UTC
May 27 2011, 06:58:32 UTC 12 months ago
October 12 2011, 19:19:37 UTC 7 months ago
Bad idea
Why would you do this? It's really invasive to this hypothetical woman's privacy. You're also assuming that because she got pregnant once, she's likely to get pregnant again and have the child next time. I find that rude and condescending.Moreover, attaching this condition ("I reserve the right to contact you in a year and lecture you about not having kids") to this so-called charity sounds exploitative to me. A woman who wants an abortion but can't afford one is likely rather desperate. What else does she have to agree to do before you deign to help?
I don't mean to be harsh because I appreciate and support the general sentiment behind your idea; however, I strongly suggest that you find another way to go about it.
October 12 2011, 19:36:27 UTC 7 months ago
Re: Bad idea
> Why would you do this?I have very logical reasons, but I'm always open to constructive feedback--that's why I post. Notice this post is very, very old. Since then I have come up with a different idea, to have the clinic give the woman a letter to read when the time is right.
> It's really invasive to this hypothetical woman's privacy.
I have an entire philosophy about privacy, about how it is harmful to society. I oppose privacy.
> You're also assuming that because she got pregnant once...
Think about this. If I had Bill Gates money, Steve Jobs money, Rupert Murdoch money, I could simply fund every woman who couldn't afford an abortion, no strings attached, and hope that some of them would go on to lead positive lives.
But I don't. I make good money, but my resources for donation are very limited.
If I give a woman $500 for an abortion and she just uses it as temporary birth control and goes on to get pregnant the next year, I just wasted my money. Poof. Gone. I might as well have burned it.
I have to leverage my limited funds to have the maximum positive benefit on society.
Remember, this isn't about making me feel better. This isn't about donating for the sake of donating, so I can sleep better or earn the esteem of my peers. This is about genuinely having a positive impact on the world, and that means being smart about where I give.
> A woman who wants an abortion but can't afford one is likely rather
> desperate.
You didn't read my post closely enough. That's why I wanted a clinic involved, to provide that buffer against accusations of exploitation. And that's why the yearlong delay before contacting the woman. After a year, she's no longer desperate.
> What else does she have to agree to do before you deign to help?
That is an inappropriate comment. There is nothing in this post, or in anything I have ever written, to indicate that I want anything from this woman. This is purely about making the world a better place.
> I strongly suggest that you find another way to go about it.
Constructive, rational suggestions are always welcome. I need more ideas.
October 12 2011, 21:15:30 UTC 7 months ago
Re: Bad idea
There is no way to guarantee that money you donate to anything will have "maximum positive benefit." People are unpredictable.I did read your post and see that you wanted a clinic involved. I don't think that changes the exploitative aspect of your charity. How she feels after a year is irrelevant -- she's desperate at the time she signs up.
Of course you want something from this woman. You want her to listen to you and do what you think is best.
As for ideas, Oregon has 20,000 homeless students: http://www.registerguard.com/web/newslo
You could help them now and offer to pay for college if they graduate.
October 12 2011, 21:28:07 UTC 7 months ago
Re: Bad idea
> There is no way to guarantee that money you donate to anythingThere are no guarantees in this world, period.
That doesn't mean that we shouldn't use some type of rational process to determine where to allocate resources. I doubt most people would advocate just giving money to random people on the street and hoping for the best.
College aid is definitely a good way to leverage my money for positive impact--a scholarship fund is in fact one of the groups I donated to last month.
I do wish, however, you would stop using the word "exploitative". That is not fair to me. Definitions, are of course myriad, but read up on the term anyway. It tends to be used in the context of trying to use somebody or something else for some type of selfish benefit.
I have no personal interest in this. This will not benefit me in the slightest. In fact, it actually HURTS me because of the stigma attached to abortion, and the stigma attached to placing conditions on charity.
There is nothing whatsoever exploitative about attaching conditions to charity, so long as those conditions are unselfish ones. Moreover, there is ample real-world evidence that unconditional charity has done a lot of harm in the world. The welfare system, for one. Also aid to the third world.
The world has so many problems because people keep making poor decisions. It is not rational, and also not fair to the rest of us, to give those in need aid without any requirement that they improve their decisions. It has been shown time and again that this encourages them to continue making poor decisions.
I think it's best to steer clear of the negative language when involved in a discussion with a person you don't know.
October 12 2011, 22:01:39 UTC 7 months ago
Re: Bad idea
You didn't read my comments closely enough. At no point did I say that attaching conditions to charity was inherently wrong. In fact my suggestion about helping the homeless students included a condition -- paying for college IF they graduate.You wanted other people's feedback, and I'm giving you mine. I think your original idea is a bad one, and there's no other way to describe it than to use negative language. As for giving the woman a letter instead of a personal lecture, I think that's... okay. Not great, but okay.
October 12 2011, 22:08:56 UTC 7 months ago
Re: Bad idea
> At no point did I say that attaching conditions to charity was inherently> wrong.
Apologies if I seemed to accuse you of that. You might not feel this way, but a lot of people do. Whenever I bring up conditional charity in a public forum, somebody always objects, bringing up terms like exploitative, coercive, paternalistic, etc. I just heard a discussion of this topic yesterday in the context of allowing food stamps to be used for fast food. So I'm a bit sensitive to that issue.
> As for giving the woman a letter instead of a personal lecture, I think
> that's... okay.
That idea is merely the next one that I had after having my original idea shot down by five clinics. I'm not claiming the letter idea is the best. It's just the best I've come up with so far.
I'm confident that with research, feedback, and deliberation, I will discover even better ideas.
I don't have the answers, and never will. All I can do is keep trying to make the greatest positive impact on the world.
October 13 2011, 00:26:12 UTC 7 months ago
Re: Bad idea
In the case of food stamps, having conditions is reasonable. AFAIK, the program is designed to keep people from starving to death, not to give them whatever they want. "Need" and "want" are not the same. Moreover, it's no more "paternalistic" to limit what people can buy with food stamps than it is to give food stamps rather than cash.As for your modified idea, the problem is not knowing the woman and her situation. For example, if a woman wanted an abortion because she was raped, a letter that tells her "you should consider not having a child until you have accumulated enough money to guarantee the upbringing of the child" would be incredibly insensitive.
October 13 2011, 00:28:57 UTC 7 months ago
Re: Bad idea
> the problem is not knowing the woman and her> situation
Yeah, I think knowing her situation is critical, and handled with sensitivity, which is why I would always want an intermediary, like a clinic.
I agree with you about the food stamps, but the fact is that many people out there will resist this idea, and will attack the people who propose it.
May 27 2011, 02:36:03 UTC 12 months ago
lmgtfy.com is a great place to start. :D
Or siriusly: http://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+s
May 27 2011, 13:01:12 UTC 12 months ago
May 27 2011, 15:26:11 UTC 12 months ago
> abortion should they desire one.
That is something I've thought about a lot, but I haven't had time to do research.
I imagine there have to be women out there who are *barely* affording college, thru a combination financial aid having to work a lot of hours on top of the courseload. I imagine that for these women, the cost of an abortion could be the straw that pushes them to drop out for a semester.
May 27 2011, 15:43:37 UTC 12 months ago
May 27 2011, 16:25:31 UTC 12 months ago
> decision is unlikely to be related to the cost of
> an abortion.
I very much want to find out if this is true, because my overarching goal is to make the most of my financial resources.
I don't want to give money to one person when it would have been better off used to help someone else.
March 4 2012, 09:16:30 UTC 2 months ago
March 4 2012, 16:14:09 UTC 2 months ago